repository · survival report #4 · 2026-10-05 · method v3 · unranked

danny-avila/LibreChat

In Survival Report #4 (2026-10-05, method v3): 78,508 of 84,488 lines introduced by 88 AI-tagged commits are still at HEAD, 92.9 %. These are counts, not grades. No rank, no colour, no verdict, and no comparison with any other repository on this page. Every number links to the audit bytes behind it and the method and its limits are public.

GitHub · latest.json · badge.svg · Survival Report #4 · all repositories · Atom feed

Baseline: this repository's untagged lines

Commits with no machine-readable AI signal, human-written, inline-completed or untagged-agent code alike: 5,651 commits, 2,250,885 lines introduced, 1,532,842 still at HEAD (68.1 % line-weighted, 54.4 % median per commit). Age is the time from a commit to HEAD. Method v3; definition at causari.dev/method.

Age-matched: AI-tagged lines 92.9 % against untagged lines of the same age 87.7 %, a gap of +5.3 pts, over 5 age windows holding 100 % of the AI-tagged lines.

Line ageAI-taggedcommitsUntaggedcommits
0–30 d88.4 %1788.1 %531
30–90 d95.4 %3189.1 %620
90–180 d94.6 %1385.7 %649
180–365 d86.7 %1879.4 %771
365–730 d34.9 %966.7 %1,014
730+ d—018.9 %2,066

By agent, in Survival Report #4

Alphabetical. A commit is attributed to the agent its metadata names; one agent per commit. VERIFIED commits only.

AgentCommitsLines introducedStill at HEADLine-weightedCapped
claude-code6277,00072,61194.3 %92.4 %
cursor226426198.9 %98.9 %
github-copilot247,2245,63678.0 %77.8 %

History across reports

One row per report this repository was measured in, oldest first; each report measured HEAD as of its own date. The line is the line-weighted ratio on a fixed 0 – 100 % axis; each point is one report.

Line-weighted ratio across reports, 0 to 100 %: #2 92.9 %; #3 92.9 %; #4 92.9 %
ReportDateAI-tagged commitsLines introducedStill at HEADLine-weighted
Survival Report #22026-09-238884,48878,46392.9 %
Survival Report #32026-09-288884,48878,51292.9 %
Survival Report #42026-10-058884,48878,50892.9 %

Reproduce

One command, any machine, no account: the same bytes the report was built from. The exact bytes behind this page are repos/danny-avila__LibreChat.json of Survival Report #4. Open an issue with your JSON if it differs.

re audit danny-avila/LibreChat --json   # method v3, full clone

Badge

Text only, one colour, no red and no green. It follows the latest report and is cached for one hour. badge-dark.svg is the same badge as paper on ink.

AI code survival  92.9 % · causari · #4 AI code survival  92.9 % · causari · #4, paper on ink

README · Markdown
[![AI code survival](https://causari.dev/r/danny-avila/librechat/badge.svg)](https://causari.dev/r/danny-avila/librechat/)

Coverage

  • Method v3, causari 0.3.0. Detection from commit metadata only; survival from git blame -w -M -C at HEAD.
  • Full clone: yes. Method v3 refuses shallow clones; this row comes from a complete history.
  • Sample: 88 AI-tagged commits; the sample floor is 5. At or above the floor, so the ratio is aggregated into the report.
  • PROBABLE: 2 PROBABLE commits (2,392 lines introduced, 2,212 still at HEAD) are listed here and never summed into the VERIFIED counts.
  • Cap: 3,109 lines per commit in this repository; the capped ratio is 90.4 %.
  • .git-blame-ignore-revs: not present in this repository.